Practical articles on organisational performance, management and transformation — in the NC & Pacific context.
ManagementSeries · 5/8
The weekly meeting that actually decides
87% of employees say they lack the time to coordinate, each absorbed by their own workload. The weekly meeting already exists almost everywhere — what it lacks is its last five minutes. Forty-five minutes, four sections, three written lines.
56% of C-suite leaders are clear on their must-win priorities. Two levels down, only 27% are. The gap is not in the strategy — it is in how the strategy travels. Four concrete things close it.
The same item is back for the third meeting running. It was settled months ago, but nobody can find what was decided, or on what basis. The four lines that keep a decision findable six months later.
A dashboard rarely suffers from a missing metric. It suffers from thirty-five too many. The three questions that decide whether a line stays or goes, and the "one in, one out" rule that stops the dashboard growing back.
The offsite, the action plan, the working group all mobilise people for a few weeks, then everything fades. What makes change stick is what comes back on a fixed date. The four markers of a real management rhythm, and where to start.
The final article of the series. Seven findings, one cause: the organisation is built to run, not to execute. The four alignments to fix — deciding, pacing, seeing, measuring — in that order.
Fewer than 25% of organisations achieve sustained performance improvement (McKinsey, 2026). Measuring is not steering: what creates performance is not the metric, but the decision it triggers.
75% of executives say they don't trust the data they rely on to make decisions (Gartner, 2025). At every level of the hierarchy, information gets filtered, softened, and summarized before it ever reaches the boardroom.
An executive spends an average of 23 hours a week in meetings. A single weekly Executive Committee meeting can cascade into up to 300,000 hours of work a year. More meetings don't guarantee you're steering anything.
Who really has the right to decide? The blind spot in executive committee governance
An org chart and a RACI matrix aren't enough to make decisions work. 4 recurring mistakes explain why the right people often don't actually hold the power to decide.
Wealth is not enough: what the highest-performing organisations understood
Zurich, Singapore, Copenhagen: their real advantage isn't only financial — it's organisational. 4 levers separate high-performing organisations from the rest.
Strategy alone is not enough: execution as a competitive advantage
Harvard Business Review estimates that 40% of strategic value is lost at the execution stage. McKinsey confirms: healthy organisations are 3× more likely to outperform. The 4 pillars of rigorous execution.
Why strategic plans fail to deliver — even when the strategy is sound
A solid strategy is not enough. Execution is the rare and decisive competence. Symptoms, root causes and 4 levers to bridge strategy and concrete results in your organisation.
Is a file still standard? The 3 criteria every manager must master
A file ceases to be standard as soon as it exceeds the usual framework in complexity, amount or risk. Three simple criteria that prevent costly misclassification.
Geopolitical volatility: 5 levers to turn it into a competitive advantage
Instability has become structural. How can executive committees transform this constraint into an advantage? A PerfEco reading of McKinsey Quarterly research.